The U.S. government is taking a big swing at Apple with an antitrust lawsuit, drawing comparisons to the historic case against Microsoft in the 1990s. However, the playing field looks quite different this time around.

Back then, Microsoft's Windows operating system held a near-monopoly on desktops. Today, Apple's iPhone enjoys a significant share of the North American market (around 55%), but Android remains a powerful global competitor. This difference in market dominance presents the first challenge for the government.

The burden of proof also adds complexity. The government needs to show that Apple's practices are actively harming consumers and stifling competition. Unlike Microsoft forcing specific software on users, Apple has the right to choose its app store partners and design its products as it sees fit. This legal gray area makes it harder for the DOJ to build a strong case.

Adding another layer of complexity is the definition of the relevant market. Apple wants a global comparison, where their market share is closer to 20%. The DOJ argues for the U.S. market specifically, where Apple holds a stronger position. This battle over market definition will significantly impact the outcome of the lawsuit.

Despite these challenges, the government seems determined to challenge dominant tech companies. This lawsuit could have a major impact on the smartphone industry. If the DOJ prevails, it could force Apple to loosen its grip on app developers, potentially leading to lower prices and greater innovation in the market.

Will Apple fall from grace like Microsoft did? Or will they successfully defend their business practices? This legal battle is sure to have a ripple effect on the tech world, and only time will tell who emerges victorious.